| Title | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Legislative Update | Federal Indian Law | October 1, 2006 |
| House rejects limits on off-reservation casinos | San Diego Union-Tribune | September 14, 2006 |
| Restriction on Off-Reservation Indian Gaming Fails to Pass House | Boston University News Service | September 14, 2006 |
| House fails to pass off-reservation gaming bill | Indianz.com | September 13, 2006 |
| Cost Estimate, HR 4893 | Congressional Budget Office | August 10, 2006 |
| Is RIGHT Wrong? | Indian Gaming Today | August 7, 2006 |
| Panels back off-rez gambling | Independent | July 25, 2006 |
| Pombo moves to shut door on off-reservation gaming | Indian Country | March 16, 2006 |
Contribution data provided by the Center for Responsive Politics (OpenSecrets.org)
Comments 
And the Indians win! by Milan Sundaresan, Jul 31, 2008 (7:27pm)
Facing tremendous opposition from several Indian tribes, H.R. 4893 sought to authorize the National Indian Gaming Commission to regulate Class III gaming and to limit lands eligible for gaming, amongst other provisions. The bill would have prevented tribes from crossing state lines and would not allow tribes that already had lands eligible for gaming from obtaining more land not contiguous to their reservations for casinos. The bill also required tribes to first receive the approval of their local community. Since the bill failed, the law stands as it was before- tribes must negotiate gaming compacts with states but do not need counties’ permission. Ultimately the stringent regulations were not put in place allowing the tribes to celebrate a clear victory.

Latest Comments
See More | New Comment