H.R.4893 - Restricting Indian Gaming to Homelands of Tribes Act of 2006 Sponsor: Richard Pombo / 109th Congress

Title
109th Congress - To amend section 20 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to restrict off-reservation gaming.
Summary
This bill creates additional regulations for off-reservation gaming. (by MAPLight.org)
Status
The bill was voted on in the House on September 13, 2006

Contributions for November 2003 - December 2003

Organization of contributorInterest Group of contributorPosition of organizations in the interest groupAmountDatesort iconLegislator (recipient)
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$50011/1/2003Nunes
MOHEGAN INDIAN TRIBE OF CONNECTICUTIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/4/2003Eshoo
SOBOBA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$25011/6/2003Bono Mack
SALT RIVER PRIMA-MARICOPA INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/7/2003Kennedy
SALT RIVER PRIMA-MARICOPA INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/7/2003Kennedy
COW CREEK BAND/UMPQUA TRIBE OF INIDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/10/2003Rangel
ST REGIS MOHAWK TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/10/2003Pallone
MOHEGAN INDIAN TRIBE OF CONNECTICUTIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/11/2003Taylor
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING ASSNIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/14/2003Kildee
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/17/2003Pallone
CHICKASAW NATIONIndian GamingOppose$30011/17/2003Inslee
COW CREEK BAND/UMPQUA TRIBE OF INIDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/17/2003Inslee
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,50011/19/2003Issa
SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/19/2003Pelosi
CUYAPAIPE BAND OF KUMEYAAY INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/20/2003Kildee
CUYAPAIPE BAND OF KUMEYAAY INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/20/2003Kildee
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/20/2003Rangel
SOBOBA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,50011/20/2003Lewis
CHICKASAW NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/20/2003Pallone
TULALIP TRIBES OF WASHINGTONIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/24/2003Kennedy
SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/24/2003Kennedy
JICARILLA APACHE NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/1/2003Pallone
PRAIRIE ISLAND TRIBAL COUNCILIndian GamingOppose$2,00012/2/2003McCollum
PRAIRIE ISLAND TRIBAL COUNCILIndian GamingOppose$2,00012/2/2003McCollum
CHICKASAW NATIONIndian GamingOppose$25012/2/2003Udall
MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,00012/2/2003Cannon
JICARILLA APACHE NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/5/2003Becerra
JICARILLA APACHE NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/8/2003Renzi
JICARILLA APACHE TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/9/2003Wilson
PRAIRIE BAND POTAWATOMI NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/9/2003Moran
LITTLE RIVER BAND OF OTTAWA INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,50012/10/2003Kildee
MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBAL NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/10/2003Kildee
GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITYIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/10/2003Kildee
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING ASSNIndian GamingOppose$-1,00012/11/2003Conyers
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING ASSNIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/11/2003Conyers
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/11/2003Kildee
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/12/2003Baca
HO-CHUNK NATIONIndian GamingOppose$50012/12/2003Kildee
SAN MANUEL BAND/SERRANO MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,00012/12/2003Kildee
PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,00012/12/2003Dicks
CHICKASAW NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/12/2003Kildee
SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/12/2003Inslee
PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/12/2003Larsen
PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/12/2003Larsen
PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,00012/15/2003Inslee
JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/15/2003Smith
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/16/2003McCrery
SALT RIVER PRIMA-MARICOPA INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/17/2003Pallone
MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBAL NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/17/2003Baca
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/18/2003Sánchez
GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITYIndian GamingOppose$2,00012/19/2003Renzi
PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/23/2003Waxman
SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$-1,00012/24/2003Kennedy
SALT RIVER PRIMA-MARICOPA INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/24/2003Abercrombie
MOHEGAN INDIAN TRIBE OF CONNECTICUTIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/24/2003Abercrombie
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,00012/28/2003Kildee
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,00012/28/2003Kildee
PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,00012/28/2003Kildee
JICARILLA APACHE NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/28/2003Kildee
PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,00012/28/2003Kildee
COW CREEK BAND OF UMPQUA INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/28/2003Kildee
SPOKANE TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/29/2003Pallone
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING ASSNIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/30/2003Pallone
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING ASSNIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/30/2003Pallone
PUEBLO OF SANDIAIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/30/2003Wilson
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/30/2003Petri
CHICKASAW NATIONIndian GamingOppose$20112/31/2003Boren
PUEBLO OF SANDIAIndian GamingOppose$-1,00012/31/2003Wilson
COW CREEK BAND/UMPQUA TRIBE OF INIDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00012/31/2003Rangel
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITYIndian GamingOppose$2,00012/31/2003Herseth Sandlin
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$50012/31/2003Berkley
JICARILLA APACHE NATIONIndian GamingOppose$2,00012/31/2003Rangel
SOBOBA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,00012/31/2003Kennedy

Contribution data provided by the Center for Responsive Politics (OpenSecrets.org)

Comments RSS feed

And the Indians win! by Milan Sundaresan, Jul 31, 2008 (7:27pm)

Facing tremendous opposition from several Indian tribes, H.R. 4893 sought to authorize the National Indian Gaming Commission to regulate Class III gaming and to limit lands eligible for gaming, amongst other provisions. The bill would have prevented tribes from crossing state lines and would not allow tribes that already had lands eligible for gaming from obtaining more land not contiguous to their reservations for casinos. The bill also required tribes to first receive the approval of their local community. Since the bill failed, the law stands as it was before- tribes must negotiate gaming compacts with states but do not need counties’ permission. Ultimately the stringent regulations were not put in place allowing the tribes to celebrate a clear victory.

Reply to this comment
Reply to this comment close
[ Tags ]
[ Tags ] close
[ Spam ]
[ Spam ] close