H.R.4893 - Restricting Indian Gaming to Homelands of Tribes Act of 2006 Sponsor: Richard Pombo / 109th Congress

Title
109th Congress - To amend section 20 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to restrict off-reservation gaming.
Summary
This bill creates additional regulations for off-reservation gaming. (by MAPLight.org)
Status
The bill was voted on in the House on September 13, 2006

Contributions for January 2004 - February 2004

Organization of contributorInterest Group of contributorPosition of organizations in the interest groupAmountDatesort iconLegislator (recipient)
SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,0001/5/2004Rahall
MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,0001/6/2004Frank
COW CREEK BAND/UMPQUA TRIBE OF INIDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0001/13/2004Baird
CABAZON BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,5001/14/2004Baca
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0001/14/2004Lewis
CABAZON BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0001/14/2004Baca
COWLITZ INDIAN TRIBE/SALISHAN-MOHEGANIndian GamingOppose$1,0001/16/2004Baird
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING ASSNIndian GamingOppose$1,0001/21/2004Inslee
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING ASSNIndian GamingOppose$2501/21/2004Herseth Sandlin
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0001/21/2004Inslee
CHEHALIS INDIAN TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$2,0001/23/2004Dicks
JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,0001/23/2004Dicks
SAN MANUEL BAND/SERRANO MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0001/23/2004Blumenauer
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITYIndian GamingOppose$1,0001/26/2004Kennedy
COW CREEK BAND/UMPQUA TRIBE OF INIDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0001/26/2004Pallone
MOHEGAN INDIAN TRIBE OF CONNECTICUTIndian GamingOppose$1,0001/27/2004Eshoo
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0001/29/2004Baca
PRAIRIE ISLAND TRIBAL COUNCILIndian GamingOppose$2501/29/2004Kennedy
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,0002/4/2004Lewis
MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWAIndian GamingOppose$2,0002/5/2004McCotter
KEWEENAW BAY INDIAN COMMUNITYIndian GamingOppose$1,0002/6/2004Pallone
WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$2,0002/10/2004Renzi
WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$2,0002/10/2004Renzi
ROBINSON RANCHERIA CITIZENS COUNCILIndian GamingOppose$1,0002/12/2004Thompson
SYCUAN BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,0002/16/2004Lungren
BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,0002/17/2004Filner
BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,0002/17/2004Filner
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$5002/17/2004Young
ONEIDA NATION OF NEW YORKIndian GamingOppose$2,0002/19/2004Cole
TRUJILLO, MARIO Indian GamingOppose$3002/19/2004Sánchez
ONEIDA NATION OF WISCONSINIndian GamingOppose$1,0002/19/2004Kind
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING ASSNIndian GamingOppose$2,0002/23/2004Renzi
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING ASSNIndian GamingOppose$1,0002/23/2004Kildee
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING ASSNIndian GamingOppose$1,0002/23/2004Issa
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING ASSNIndian GamingOppose$1,0002/23/2004Kennedy
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0002/23/2004Pallone
TOHONO O'ODHAM NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,0002/24/2004Pallone
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF COLVILLEIndian GamingOppose$1,0002/24/2004Pallone
SISSETON-WAHPETON SIOUX TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,0002/24/2004Pallone
SALT RIVER PRIMA-MARICOPA INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0002/24/2004Pallone
PRAIRIE ISLAND TRIBAL COUNCILIndian GamingOppose$1,0002/24/2004Pallone
THREE AFFILIATED TRIBES OF FORT BERTHOLDIndian GamingOppose$5002/24/2004Pallone
PRAIRIE ISLAND TRIBAL COUNCILIndian GamingOppose$5002/24/2004Herseth Sandlin
BOIS FORTE RESERVATION TRIBAL COUNCILIndian GamingOppose$1,0002/24/2004Pallone
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMAIndian GamingOppose$2502/25/2004Boren
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMAIndian GamingOppose$2502/25/2004Boren
SAN MANUEL BAND/SERRANO MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,0002/26/2004Renzi
MICCOSUKEE INDIAN TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$5002/27/2004Hastings

Contribution data provided by the Center for Responsive Politics (OpenSecrets.org)

Comments RSS feed

And the Indians win! by Milan Sundaresan, Jul 31, 2008 (7:27pm)

Facing tremendous opposition from several Indian tribes, H.R. 4893 sought to authorize the National Indian Gaming Commission to regulate Class III gaming and to limit lands eligible for gaming, amongst other provisions. The bill would have prevented tribes from crossing state lines and would not allow tribes that already had lands eligible for gaming from obtaining more land not contiguous to their reservations for casinos. The bill also required tribes to first receive the approval of their local community. Since the bill failed, the law stands as it was before- tribes must negotiate gaming compacts with states but do not need counties’ permission. Ultimately the stringent regulations were not put in place allowing the tribes to celebrate a clear victory.