H.R.4893 - Restricting Indian Gaming to Homelands of Tribes Act of 2006 Sponsor: Richard Pombo / 109th Congress

Title
109th Congress - To amend section 20 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to restrict off-reservation gaming.
Summary
This bill creates additional regulations for off-reservation gaming. (by MAPLight.org)
Status
The bill was voted on in the House on September 13, 2006

Contributions for November 2004 - December 2004

Organization of contributorInterest Group of contributorPosition of organizations in the interest groupAmountDatesort iconLegislator (recipient)
PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/1/2004Gallegly
TULE RIVER INDIAN RIVER TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/1/2004Cardoza
TULE RIVER INDIAN RIVER TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/1/2004Pallone
MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBAL NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/1/2004Gerlach
TULE RIVER INDIAN RIVER TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/1/2004Baca
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/1/2004Issa
TULE RIVER INDIAN RIVER TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/1/2004Rehberg
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/1/2004Baca
BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/1/2004Nadler
SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/1/2004Rehberg
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMAIndian GamingOppose$50011/1/2004Baca
TULE RIVER INDIAN RIVER TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/1/2004Walden
TULE RIVER INDIAN RIVER TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/1/2004Manzullo
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$50011/1/2004Obey
TULE RIVER INDIAN RIVER TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/1/2004Calvert
TULE RIVER INDIAN RIVER TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/2/2004Sánchez
PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/2/2004Calvert
CHICKASAW NATIONIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/2/2004Porter
TULE RIVER TRIBE OF THE TULE RIVERIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/2/2004Lewis
ONEIDA NATION OF WISCONSINIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/2/2004Moore
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/2/2004Lewis
MILLE LACS BAND OF OJIBWEIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/2/2004Pallone
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/2/2004Jones
TWENTY-NINE PALMS BAND MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/2/2004Baca
GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITYIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/2/2004Pallone
MOHEGAN INDIAN TRIBE OF CONNECTICUTIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/2/2004Kildee
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$50011/2/2004Nadler
SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/2/2004Cole
PUEBLO OF POJOAQUEIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/2/2004Udall
MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBAL NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/2/2004Bono Mack
TULE RIVER INDIAN RIVER TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/3/2004Napolitano
SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/4/2004Larson
TULE RIVER INDIAN RIVER TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/4/2004Regula
MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBAL NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/4/2004Larson
JICARILLA APACHE TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/4/2004Udall
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/4/2004Larson
BISHOP INDIAN TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/10/2004Becerra
TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LOUISIANAIndian GamingOppose$50011/15/2004Melancon
HOOPA VALLEY TRIBAL COUNCILIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/15/2004Thompson
PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/16/2004Camp
MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBAL NATIONIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/17/2004Cole
CHITIMACHA TRIBE OF LOUISIANAIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/18/2004Boustany
SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$2,00011/18/2004Camp
ALABAMA COUSHATTA TRIBE OF TEXASIndian GamingOppose$-1,00011/24/2004Kennedy
MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBAL NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,00011/30/2004Boustany
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDAIndian GamingOppose$2,00012/2/2004Wasserman Schultz
SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$2,00012/13/2004Regula
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$-1,00012/22/2004Miller

Contribution data provided by the Center for Responsive Politics (OpenSecrets.org)

Comments RSS feed

And the Indians win! by Milan Sundaresan, Jul 31, 2008 (7:27pm)

Facing tremendous opposition from several Indian tribes, H.R. 4893 sought to authorize the National Indian Gaming Commission to regulate Class III gaming and to limit lands eligible for gaming, amongst other provisions. The bill would have prevented tribes from crossing state lines and would not allow tribes that already had lands eligible for gaming from obtaining more land not contiguous to their reservations for casinos. The bill also required tribes to first receive the approval of their local community. Since the bill failed, the law stands as it was before- tribes must negotiate gaming compacts with states but do not need counties’ permission. Ultimately the stringent regulations were not put in place allowing the tribes to celebrate a clear victory.