H.R.4893 - Restricting Indian Gaming to Homelands of Tribes Act of 2006 Sponsor: Richard Pombo / 109th Congress

Title
109th Congress - To amend section 20 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to restrict off-reservation gaming.
Summary
This bill creates additional regulations for off-reservation gaming. (by MAPLight.org)
Status
The bill was voted on in the House on September 13, 2006

Contributions for July 2004 - August 2004

Organization of contributorInterest Group of contributorPosition of organizations in the interest groupAmountDatesort iconLegislator (recipient)
ONEIDA NATION OF WISCONSINIndian GamingOppose$2,0007/7/2004Obey
ONEIDA NATION OF WISCONSINIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/7/2004Obey
MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/7/2004Kennedy
SALT RIVER PRIMA-MARICOPA INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/9/2004Cole
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/9/2004Miller
COW CREEK BAND OF UMPQUA INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/12/2004Moore
MANDAN HIDATSA ARIKARA NATIONIndian GamingOppose$5007/12/2004Pallone
MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$2507/12/2004Kennedy
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/13/2004Weller
ONEIDA NATION OF NEW YORKIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/14/2004Abercrombie
ONEIDA NATION OF NEW YORKIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/14/2004Abercrombie
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING ASSNIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/14/2004Kind
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLAIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/14/2004Blumenauer
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING ASSNIndian GamingOppose$1707/15/2004Kind
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$5007/16/2004Baca
VIEJAS BAND OF KUMEYAAY INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,0007/16/2004Rehberg
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$5007/16/2004Napolitano
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/16/2004Nunes
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/18/2004Issa
CABAZON BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,0007/21/2004Lungren
CHICKASAW NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/21/2004Boren
MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBAL NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/21/2004Levin
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING ASSNIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/22/2004Rehberg
JICARILLA APACHE NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/22/2004Renzi
CHICKASAW NATIONIndian GamingOppose$5007/22/2004Boren
JICARILLA APACHE NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/22/2004Renzi
HO-CHUNK NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/23/2004Obey
CHICKASAW NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/23/2004Boren
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/23/2004Becerra
HOOPA VALLEY TRIBAL COUNCILIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/26/2004Thompson
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/26/2004Calvert
MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBAL NATIONIndian GamingOppose$2,0007/27/2004Kind
MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMAIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/27/2004Boren
AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITYIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/28/2004Kennedy
PRAIRIE BAND POTAWATOMI NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,0007/30/2004Moran
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING ASSNIndian GamingOppose$5008/3/2004Renzi
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0008/4/2004Tauscher
TOHONO O'ODHAM NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,0008/4/2004Renzi
YAKAMA INDIAN NATIONIndian GamingOppose$5008/4/2004Hastings
TOHONO O'ODHAM NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,0008/4/2004Renzi
WHITE EARTH BAND OF MINNESOTA CHIPPEWAIndian GamingOppose$4008/4/2004Peterson
COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBES Indian GamingOppose$1,0008/6/2004Renzi
MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBAL NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,0008/9/2004Waters
VIEJAS BAND OF KUMEYAAY INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,0008/9/2004Cannon
CHITIMACHA TRIBE OF LOUISIANAIndian GamingOppose$1,0008/9/2004Melancon
TABLE MOUNTAIN RANCHERIAIndian GamingOppose$2,0008/9/2004Costa
TABLE MOUNTAIN RANCHERIAIndian GamingOppose$1,0008/9/2004Costa
MICCOSUKEE INDIAN TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$2,0008/10/2004Wasserman Schultz
MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,0008/10/2004Pickering
MESCALERO APACHE TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$1,0008/11/2004Renzi
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,0008/11/2004Renzi
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,0008/11/2004Renzi
ST REGIS MOHAWK TRIBAL COUNCILIndian GamingOppose$1,0008/13/2004Rangel
ST REGIS MOHAWK TRIBAL COUNCILIndian GamingOppose$1,0008/13/2004Rangel
COW CREEK BAND/UMPQUA TRIBE OF INIDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,0008/15/2004Hooley
COW CREEK BAND/UMPQUA TRIBE OF INIDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0008/15/2004Obey
LUNA ENTERTAINMENTIndian GamingOppose$2508/19/2004McCotter
PECHANGA BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,1768/19/2004Bishop
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,1768/23/2004Bishop
MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,0008/23/2004Cantor
CHICKASAW NATIONIndian GamingOppose$1,0008/23/2004Cole
LUNA ENTERTAINMENTIndian GamingOppose$2,0008/24/2004McCotter
LUNA ENTERTAINMENTIndian GamingOppose$2508/24/2004McCotter
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITYIndian GamingOppose$5008/25/2004Kline
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITYIndian GamingOppose$5008/25/2004Kline
ONEIDA NATION OF WISCONSINIndian GamingOppose$1,0008/25/2004Oberstar
GRAND PORTAGE TRIBAL COUNCILIndian GamingOppose$1,0008/25/2004Oberstar
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0008/26/2004Rehberg
PUEBLO OF POJOAQUEIndian GamingOppose$1,0008/27/2004Pastor
COW CREEK BAND/UMPQUA TRIBE OF INIDIANSIndian GamingOppose$2,0008/30/2004Pallone
COW CREEK BAND/UMPQUA TRIBE OF INIDIANSIndian GamingOppose$1,0008/30/2004Edwards
JICARILLA APACHE TRIBEIndian GamingOppose$2,0008/31/2004Udall

Contribution data provided by the Center for Responsive Politics (OpenSecrets.org)

Comments RSS feed

And the Indians win! by Milan Sundaresan, Jul 31, 2008 (7:27pm)

Facing tremendous opposition from several Indian tribes, H.R. 4893 sought to authorize the National Indian Gaming Commission to regulate Class III gaming and to limit lands eligible for gaming, amongst other provisions. The bill would have prevented tribes from crossing state lines and would not allow tribes that already had lands eligible for gaming from obtaining more land not contiguous to their reservations for casinos. The bill also required tribes to first receive the approval of their local community. Since the bill failed, the law stands as it was before- tribes must negotiate gaming compacts with states but do not need counties’ permission. Ultimately the stringent regulations were not put in place allowing the tribes to celebrate a clear victory.